Correcting the Los Angeles Times
In an editorial today, the Los Angeles Times provided an article that started completely with a false statement. Their writer Nathaniel Popper, wrote the following:
People who pay high fees to borrow from so-called payday lenders generally don’t have bank accounts, but that doesn’t mean banks aren’t making money from them.
This statement is completely false and incorrect. All payday lenders check for following before they make any type of loans.
1. Employment & income: Employment verification letters could be fake, pay stubs could be fake, but checking bank accounts electronically or via phone with a banker cannot be faked. And almost all payday lenders contact banks, either via phone or electronically, to verify employment and income making sure the borrower is indeed employed and receives paychecks on consistent basis.
2. Checking Balance: Payday lenders look at the borrowers bank statement and often reject applicants with too many insufficient funds because those are the type of borrowers that will more likely to default.
3. Direct Deposit: Majority of lenders, in particular online lenders, require their borrowers to receive their paychecks via direct deposit so they can debit payments when it is due. Typically those with direct deposit are less likely to default on their loans.
4. Account Receivable & Collections: Payday lenders often debit payments for account receivable and collection purposes. So it is important for the borrower to have an account.
As you can see, there are many facts the Los Angeles Times writer failed to see before he made that false claim about payday loan borrowers don’t’ have an account. It is important not to confuse check cashing services and payday loan services. It is true that many check cashing stores offer payday loans too but they are complete different products and those customers who borrow payday loans must have a bank account.





